Using facial recognition to identify and deny entry to an individual attending a Broadway show.
This follows a story about a woman in England that was arrested for thinking silent prayers in an area designated under a “Public Spaces Protection Order.” Protest is not allowed in these protected areas. So, it appears that prayer is a form of protest. Whodda thunk.
Its curious how MSG, a private company, was able to get access to a biometrics database that had an image of the individual in question. Facebook? Government?
I have the same question about the recent study out of Canada that came to the conclusion that unvaccinated drivers are more likely to be in serious car accidents. In order to come to any kind of conclusion like that, the researchers would need 1) personal health records that identified the vaccination status of all individuals; 2) records of all car accidents and the individuals involved; 3) hospital ER records of all people admitted following a car accident.
Researchers would then need to triangulate this information to somehow reach a conclusion that vaccination status and involvement in car accidents are somehow linked. But, how are researchers able to get access to health and hospital records down to the individual? Either the research is bogus and they are lying about the linkage (which I believe to be true) or health authorities (ie the government) is violating personal privacy.
According to the study, “We identified individuals using encrypted identifiers from official government registries … The study was registered in advance, approved by the Sunnybrook Research Ethics Board, and conducted using Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences safeguards.” So, “encrypted identifiers” is the technology being used to anonymize personal information that the government assures you is private and protected. Clearly it is neither. Par for the course these days, especially when the government is behind the effort to vilify and punish its citizens.
The researchers also suggested unvaccinated drivers should face higher insurance premiums, due to greater risk. If that is indeed a conclusion, then vaccinated people should face higher health insurance and life insurance premiums, due to vaccine injury and death. Clearly, VAERS vaccine injury reports and excess mortality studies have concluded this.
Interesting how the study that vilifies unvaccinated has gone viral, and studies which identify excess mortality are censured. VAERS database is even being scrubbed of incriminating evidence that The Jab causes injury and death.
See the post below for more details.
In 3-5 years, when biproducts of The Jab really dig in, the world is headed for a dire health crisis. They can publish all the bogus studies about the unvaccinated they want. It is not going to change the inevitable outcomes that are stalking the vaccinated.