Electroverse.net appears to be a good resource for documenting the actual, observed changes affecting the global climate. At a glance, it looks like a lot of cooling going on.
addendum: Stuart Basden, co-founder of Extinction Rebellion, writes in Medium that ER is not about climate, it is about crashing European society and skewering the idea that ” heterosexuality is ‘normal’ and that other expressions of sexuality are deviant .” Think about that as you see ER activists super-gluing themselves to trains, streets, and anything else that might cause maximum disruption. *see below re: “some may die in the process.” I guess for the greater good or something.
If this wasn’t such a serious topic, this would be pretty damn funny. What a farce.
In an article on their website, the Competitive Enterprise Institute is building on the work done by RealClimateScience.com to compile a shaming list of dire apocalyptic environmental predictions over the years, NONE of which came true.
Global warming, a coming ice age, holes in the ozone, acid rain, rising sea levels, capitalism and consumerism all, at one time or another, spelled doom to the earth and humanity.
How about this one from The Guardian in 2004: “Climate Change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters … A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a ‘Siberian’ climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world.” Clearly the doomsday clock struck midnight, and nobody heard it. No wonder they suppressed the report.
postmortem: The Climate Apocalypse referenced in the above 2004 Guardian piece officially bites the dust. It was fun while it lasted.
As the references on both sites make clear, the predictions aren’t necessarily made by cranks, but by mainstream voices, typically holding respected positions in government and science. Except, of course, Al Gore who made millions trading in the market for carbon offsets, while beating the drum about man-caused climate change.
After decades of fake science with their doom and gloom predictions, its time to stand up and refuse to be manipulated. But there is just too much money to be made milking the always on the horizon apocalypse.
Time to wake up people. Man-made climate change is fake science. Its a control thing, meant to subjugate humanity. Given to us by the same ruling class that seeks to subjugate us with globalism.
Is Global Warming the biggest fraud in history? Watch this video and consider your answer.
Extinction Rebellion leader Gründer Roger Hallam: “We’re going to force the governments to act. And if they don’t, we will bring them down and create a democracy fit for purpose. And yes, some may die in the process. “
Climate alarmist group Extinction Rebellion is fascist. Flat out fascist. Hallam is advocating bringing down elected governments by force, and yes, even killing people to satisfy their political goals. Chaos. Anarchy. Nihilism. Tools of the trade.
Where have we heard that before? Benito Mussolini = Fascist Italy. Hitler = Nazi Germany. Mao Zedong = Communist China.
Compare and contrast Nazi Germany brown-shirts with fascist Italy black-shirts with Antifa black-shirts. Its deja vu all over again.
People … its time to wake up to what is really going on here. Antifa, Extinction Rebellion, Climate Activism, Impeaching Trump, et al are political efforts to overthrow democratic government and install fascist, totalitarian regimes. Globalism, Progressivism are code-words for Fascism and population control. See it for what it is. Reject it.
“Those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it” — George Santayana
As a related addendum, here is a good interview by BBC’s Andrew Neil with one of Extinction Rebellion’s talking heads. Neil challenges ERs talking point that climate change is going to cause the death of billions of people in the next 10 to 20 years. When confronted with the total lack of valid evidence that such an outcome is possible, the ER person says, “unfortunately, alarmist language works.”
Neil further challenges ERs target for zero emissions by 2025 and what it would take to reach that goal. Basically, burning of any fossil fuels would need to stop, which essentially means all economic actity — airplane travel, cooking and heating with gas etc. ER responds that experts would need to look at these things. But when confronted by Neil that experts have, and presenting data to the contrary, ER faults that data and points to more acceptable experts e.g. totally discredited Michael Mann. What a farce.
Here also is an interview with Dr Tim Ball, who talks about the climate change hoax and Greta Thunberg’s unfortunate (for her) role in promoting the hoax. Dr Ball was the climate scientist who called out Michael Mann’s hockey stick as fake science, was sued by Mann in BC court, and unequivocally won (including damages) when Mann refused to present his data and algorithms in court as demanded by the presiding judge. A cold day in hell for climate activists.
On Greta, Ball accuses her mother of child abuse for putting a child with acknowledged mental health issues on the world stage in this manner. He doesn’t blame Greta for anything she says, but the people and organization behind her, including the UN and its IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change).
The wide-ranging interview with Ball is enlightening and important. It should be transcribed and distributed broadly. He discusses the conspiracy and corruption behind the climate debate, its genesis being in the ’60s with the Club of Rome. Soros tends to be identified as the boogie man manipulating issues like this behind the scenes, but he is the face of a largely faceless Club of Rome with founding uber-rich guy David Rockefeller. For people like Soros and the Rockefellers, it is not about wealth, it is about power and control. The climate debate uses the environment to control the people. There is lots more to be concerned about than CO2 emissions.
Two basic ideals that are now under attack are free will and free speech. Nowhere else in the world are these ideals as staunchly defended than the USA and within Christianity. But, we have progressives and progressive-run tech platforms actually censoring conservative voices and patrolling free speech. What is fake news? Basically, we are at the point where actual facts are attacked and debunked when it doesn’t suit the progressive narrative, of which the climate debate is one of many topics. When you can no longer separate truth from lies, there is no truth. Shut down the free flow of ideas and information and we all die in darkness.
I’m not sure how the math works here.
Dutifully reported by the CBC, according to a Canadian report on climate ( Canada’s Changing Climate Report (CCCR)), “Canada is, on average, experiencing warming at twice the rate of the rest of the world, with Northern Canada heating up at almost three times the global average, according to a new government report. ”
Hmm. Okay. But how does that explain this. Botalia Morpheus: “After going through many headlines today, I’ve learned that that the entire planet is warming at twice the rate as the rest of the planet.”
If you haven’t taken a look at the link, Natalia Mateo put together a twitter thread that lists countries, regions and geography (e.g. mountains) that are reported to be experiencing rising temperatures at higher than average rates. Twice the average rate is pretty common: Sweden, Russia, the arctic, Norway, South Africa, Tibet, all of Africa, mountains in general, China, Alaska, Japan, Korea, Iceland, Britain, Adirondacks, Spain, Australia, Finland, the Himalayas, and Singapore.
Now, clearly, that’s not the whole world, but it certainly suggests a big chunk of the surface of the earth. So … who is bringing down the average? According to this “science” the rest of the earth is warming at below the average rate, to establish the average. Or perhaps even cooling. After all, we are talking about averages and it has to balance out on the other side.
Taking this information at face value (which would be folly), if all these regions are increasing at a rate greater than everyone else, shouldn’t the reporting actually be that Canada et al are increasing at the average rate. But, of course, that won’t suit the climate alarmist narrative. And I am certain the data is not there to support such a contention.
More cooking the data it looks like. Perhaps that is why temperatures are rising.